Thursday, 31 July 2014

Progression is this an easy mountain to CLIMB

Raghavan K, Healy BC, Carruthers RL, Chitnis T. Progression rates and sample size estimates for PPMS based on the CLIMB study population. Mult Scler. 2014 Jul. pii: 1352458514541976. [Epub ahead of print]

BACKGROUND: The clinical trial design for primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) requires understanding of disability progression in modern patient cohorts.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to characterize demographic and clinical characteristics of PPMS and assess rate of disability progression.
METHODS: We studied PPMS (n = 73) and relapsing-onset MS (ROMS) patients (n = 1541) enrolled in CLIMB, a longitudinal study of MS patients at the Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, MA). Disability progression for each group was compared using interval-censored survival analysis and time to six-month sustained progression.
RESULTS: The PP group had a 1.09:1 male:female ratio compared to 1:2.89 for the RO group and greater mean age of onset (PP: 44.4±9.6; RO: 32.7±9.9; p < 0.0001). Motor symptoms at onset and first symptoms localized to spinal cord were each strongly associated with PPMS (p < 0.001). Median time from onset to EDSS 6.0 was faster in PPMS (p < 0.001). PPMS patients progressed faster to EDSS 3 (p < 0.001) and from EDSS 3 to 6 (p < 0.001). Median time to sustained progression in the PP group was 4.85 years (95% CI 2.83-8.35), significantly faster than the RO group (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our modern PPMS cohort is demographically similar to previously studied cohorts. PPMS is associated with faster disability accrual than ROMS. Current real-world observations of time to sustained progression will inform design of new clinical trials for PPMS.

CLIMB (Comprehensive Longitudinal Investigation of Multiple Berosis) is based at Harvard. The CLIMB study is a large-scale, long-term study of patients with MS. It is designed to investigate the course of the disease in the current era of treatment. The main goals of the study are to:

1. Identify predictors of future disease course when patients are at the beginning of their illness.

They found males and age of onset and spinal disease

2. Determine the effects of treatment on disease progression and accumulation of disability.

I suspect you are asking what treatments..need to do better
In this study people with progressive MS were behaving as predicted in terms of their progression rates, is this to be expected because they are not recieving any effective treatments. 

However the question is if PPMSers are in trials then will this rate be the same. In the CUPID trial of tetrahydrocannabinol people in the trial progressed at at much slower rate than predicted.

I am sure the key aspect on your tounge is where are the treatments?

1 comment:

  1. If we found out what causes MS, there wouldn't be a need for treatments, because we wouldn't get it in the first place.


Please note that all comments are moderated and any personal or marketing-related submissions will not be shown.