Friday, 12 September 2014

An Interesting first presentation of MS

This case report outlines an interesting first presentation of MS in a 28 year old man.  

The levels of water in your bloodstream are maintained at the right level by a process called homeostasis and more specifically by a hormone called antidiuretic hormone (ADH). Diuresis is the process of passing urine so the hormone does exactly what it says in the tin – it stops you peeing.
ADH is produced in a neuroendocrine structure called the hypothalamus and is stored in the pituitary gland which is located in your brain just behind and between your eyes.

When you don’t have enough water on-board i.e. you’re dehydrated or have been sweating, your pituitary gland releases ADH and this acts on the kidneys to make them reabsorb more water and you pee less.

When you’ve drunk too much water, less ADH is released and you therefore have a ‘diuresis’ i.e. you pass more urine through your kidney.


Sometimes your brain fails to produce/release the ADH or your kidneys don’t respond to it and this is known as Diabetes Insipidus (not to be confused with diabetes mellitus that involves insulin). In this condition, your body works on the assumption that you always have too much water on board (the right hand side of diagram) resulting in loss of huge amounts of urine from the kidneys. You end up needing to drink lots of water to stay hydrated which is sometimes easier said than done.

This case report describes a gentleman who presented with a 7 year history of drinking >10 litres of water per day. When he was given a form of ADH by a doctor, he was able to concentrate his urine which proved that he was not producing ADH himself but that his kidneys were able to respond to the hormone. He was diagnosed with diabetes insipidus. Interestingly, he re-presented two months later with optic neuritis and a diagnosis of MS was made. An MRI of his brain showed lesions in his hypothalamus which accounted for his inability to produce ADH.

The most common first presentation of MS is optic neuritis. In contrast, there have only been three documented cases of MSers presenting with diabetes insipidus in the literature. One reason for this may be that demyelinating lesions are hardly detectable in the hypothalamus using conventional MRI.

Did you first present with an uncommon symptom related to MS?

Did it take a while for you to be referred to a neurologist?

Was your diagnosis delayed in any way?

The current paradigm of MS focuses on the importance of starting treatment early – (Prof G calls this ZeTo) and therefore any delay could potentially represent a missed opportunity to start treatment. This makes it important that people are referred to neuros early if their GP suspects they may have MS.    

Neurology. 2011 May 31;76(22):1939-40. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821d750c.
Diabetes insipidus as a first manifestation in multiple sclerosis.


3 comments:

  1. I had labyrinthitis as my first MS symptom. However it is still not fully confirmed if this was an ear infection or central (MS). I've read that labyrinthitis can present as a first symptom of MS so it's not uncommon. I do remember feeling stressed before the symptom started. The diagnosis of my condition was delayed due to the GP being hesitant in referring me to the hospital, then when I was finally referred it was the incorrect referral care pathway.

    ReplyDelete
  2. >Did you first present with an uncommon symptom related to MS?
    No. I first presented with optic neuritis (in 2010).

    >Did it take a while for you to be referred to a neurologist?
    I was quickly referred to an ophthalmologist but was not referred to a neurologist until 2012 after a few visits to my GP with further symptoms that troubled me.

    There was a letter to the BMJ in 2006 by an ophthalmologist querying, in the light of the 2005 revised McDonald criteria, the then standard practice of no further action. There may well have been signs for a neurologist to find. Examination by a neurologist (2012) did find end point nystagmus that I was unaware of.

    >Was your diagnosis delayed in any way?
    I don't know but possibly I would have met the then current McDonald criteria,
    Has current ophthalmologist practice changed to allow the possibility of diagnosis by the revised McDonald criteria or identification of a high probability of transition from CIS to MS?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Uveitis 1989. It wasn't associated with MS at the time and it took almost 12 years going back and forth to Queens Square , saying I believed I had MS and it being dismissed. Same sensory symptoms now as then. But it took a relapse with l'hermittes in 2001 to get a diagnosis. That was paying privately for MRIs (showing lesions) etc. Even then it wasn't until I insisted on a lumber puncture that I was diagnosed as my presentation was so 'unusual'.

    ReplyDelete

Please note that all comments are moderated and any personal or marketing-related submissions will not be shown.