Scientific-schadenfreude

Had a laugh today about a paper in the guardian (Link), where scientist forgot to remove a note from the paper. 
It was not picked up during editing and publishing such that it was said "should we cite the crappy....paper". This happens and reminds me once our response to the referees comments was published in error as supplementary data...we were lucky that we had decided not to slag off someones work by name in this response. We had it removed within the day of publishing but it was a funny situation.

Labels: