Friday, 16 January 2015

Anti-CD20 can block T cell functionality

Anthony DC, Dickens AM, Seneca N, Couch Y, Campbell S, Checa B, Kersemans V, Warren EA, Tredwell M, Sibson NR, Gouverneur V, Leppert D. Anti-CD20 inhibits T cell-mediated pathology and microgliosis in the rat brain. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2014;1(9):659-669.
OBJECTIVE:The mechanism of action of anti-B cell therapy in multiple sclerosis (MS) is not fully understood. Here, we compared the effect of anti-CD20 therapy on microglial activation in two distinct focal rat models of MS.
METHODS: The effect of anti-CD20 therapy on lesion formation and extra-lesional microglial activation was evaluated in the fDTH-EAE (experimental allergic encephalomyelitis) model, which is a focal demyelinating type-IV delayed-type hypersensitivity lesion. For comparison, effects were also assessed in the focal humoral MOG model induced by intracerebral injection of cytokine in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein immunized rats. Microglial activation was assessed in situ and in vivo using the TSPO SPECT ligand [125I]DPA-713, and by immunostaining for MHCII. The effect of treatment on demyelination and lymphocyte recruitment to the brain were evaluated.
RESULTS: Anti-CD20 therapy reduced microglial activation, and lesion formation in the humoral model, but it was most effective in the antibody-independent fDTH-EAE. Immunohistochemistry for MHCII also demonstrated a reduced volume of microglial activation in the brains of anti-CD20-treated fDTH-EAE animals, which was accompanied by a reduction in T-cell recruitment and demyelination. The effect anti-CD20 therapy in the latter model was similarly strong as compared to the T-cell targeting MS compound FTY720.
INTERPRETATION:The suppression of lesion development by anti-CD20 treatment in an antibody-independent model suggests that B-cells play an important role in lesion development, independent of auto-antibody production. Thus, CD20-positive B-cell depletion has the potential to be effective in a wider population of individuals with MS than might have been predicted from our knowledge of the underlying histopathology.

Anti-B cell therapy working in MS has thrown a spanner in the T cell hypothesis of MS. However, not quite it seems. In an animal model of MS it can be shown that inhibition of B cell function can limit T cell activity and so this will limit macrophage/microglial cell activity. It is clear that the function of B cells is not just to produce antibody and anti-CD20 is not on the antibody producing B cells so its action may not be at the level of antibody production. However it is known that B cells can active T cells, is this part of the B cells treatments working in MS. Other groups have found that some T cells also express CD20 and get hit by these the T cell hypothesis is not yet broken. Some may argue otherwise


  1. Mouse, Thanks. Your summary really illustrates why MS research never reaches any definitive answers - too many theories and hypotheses and too many competing teams. This is made worse by EAE - which bears no resemblance to MS. Throw in hormones, gender and viruses and it become even more confusing. It's like trying to solve Rubik's cube in the dark. At least when Prof G returns from his walkabout he won't have much to catch up on - a couple of failed trials and a plethora of EAE or qOL research. I don't think we are any nearer to understanding the disease than 10 years ago.

    1. Can you ever have too many hypotheses? I don't think so. They can be tested.
      Some EAE models are far more comparable to MS than others. Our own for example.
      Failed trials? Watch this space!
      I think we are far closer to understanding MS than we were 10 years ago and the pace of understanding is increasing.
      All the best.

  2. Is 'thrown a scanner (I assume MRI) in the works' a neurology phrase?


Please note that all comments are moderated and any personal or marketing-related submissions will not be shown.