Thursday, 15 January 2015

Neutralising antibodies to interferon beta

What is the impact of NABs to interferon-beta on normal biology? #MSBlog #MSResearch

"If you are on interferon-beta treatment you should be tested for neutralising antibodies at 12 and 24 months. Between 2-35% of MSers treated with IFNbeta develop NABs. NABs prevent IFNbeta binding to its receptors and stop it working. In general MSers with NABs do no better than someone on placebo. NABs predict DMT failure in the future and are associated with increased MRI activity, relapse rate and more rapid disease progression. NABs don't always persist; in some MSers they are transient and dissappear. MSers with low levels of NABs and those on IFNbeta-1b (Betaseron or Betaferon or Extavia) are more likely to lose their NABs. The study below shows that the binding properties of transient and persistent NABs are different; i.e transient NABs have lower affinity or don't bind as strongly to IFNbeta as persistent NABs. The observation is to be expected because as the immune response matures the strength of binding of antibodies tends to get stronger. Immunologists call this phenomenon affinity maturation; in layman terms the memory of the B-cells and its antibodies get better with time. In those who have transient NABs their immune system forgets and lose it antibodies; this is called tolerance or anergy in Immunology Speak.  

Do NABs have any other effects? Yes, I suspect so. We have only one copy of the IFNbeta gene and NABs probably neutralise our own IFNbeta. This may cause problems. IFNbeta is important for the body to fight infections, cancer and is involved in bone development. We have one patient who after developing NABs developed severe recurrent herpes; we have hypothesised that is occurred because her ability to fight the herpetic infection had been compromised by the loss of function of her own IFNbeta. With regard to cancer and bone growth we  have no idea. I have asked all the Pharma companies who produce IFNbeta to look into this but my requests have fallen on deaf ears. The bone formation question will need to be looked for in children born to women with NABs.  NABs  cross the placenta and may interfere with the action of IFNbeta in the foetus and interfere with early bone formation. The effect on bone development may be very subtle. What about cancer? To look for an increased risk of cancers in MSers with persistent NABs would require a longterm study; the latter may be possible in Denmark where they have been measuring NABs routinely for decades and have excellent national cancer registries. The question is a simple one; do MSers who have NABs have a higher incidence of cancer than MSers without NABs?"


Epub: Gibbs et al. Antibody dissociation rates are predictive of neutralizing antibody (NAb) course: A comparison of interferon beta-1b-treated patients with transient versus sustained NAbs. Clin Immunol. 2014. pii: S1521-6616(14)00283-6.

Background: A proportion of  MSers treated with interferon-β (IFNβ) develop neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) which can reduce therapeutic efficacy. 

Objectives and Methods: In the Betaseron/Betaferon in Newly Emerging MS For Initial Treatment (BENEFIT) study, 88/277 MSers developed NAbs, 48 having transient positivity and 29 having sustained positivity. This study aimed to investigate the antibody binding characteristics of serial sera in a subset of these two patient groups. Using Biacore™, a surface plasmon resonance-based technology that monitors biomolecular interactions in real-time, we immobilized pure IFNβ-1b and analysed antibody binding responses and dissociation rates of these sera. 

Results: NAb titres correlated directly with binding responses and inversely with dissociation rates, and sera from sustained NAb patients demonstrated significantly higher binding responses and slower dissociation rates than sera from transient NAb patients.

Conclusion: Thus transient and sustained NAbs are quantitatively and qualitatively different, and interestingly, binding responses and dissociation rates at month 12 could predict the NAb course.

CoI: multiple

4 comments:

  1. What about tysabri nabs?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Re: "What about tysabri nabs?"

      Yes, they are also a problem and need to be measured in any MSers who has an infusion reaction to natalizumab and at 12 months. In MSers with NABs to natalizumab the drug does not work and they need to stop natalizumab and switch to another agent.

      Delete
  2. Does everyone in your clinic get tested?
    I asked about this is my clinic and was told it is not needed. Possibly because I have not had a big relapse recently.
    The variation in practice across the UK continues to frustrate and confuse me.
    I see that the report from the Neurological Alliance published yesterday (the Invisible patient) talks abut the lottery of care.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Re: "Does everyone in your clinic get tested? "

      Almost everyone; it is part of our BARTS-MS protocol. However, if you are still getting obvious flu-like symptoms you are unlikely to have NABs. In addition, in patients who are planning to stop interferon-beta it makes little sense to test them. Adoption of NAB testing is patchy, because the ABN guidelines on MS DMTs have never been firm on NAB testing.

      Delete

Please note that all comments are moderated and any personal or marketing-related submissions will not be shown.