Tuesday, 6 March 2018

Complementary medicine in MS

Are you a complementary or alternative medicine person? This post is about the usage of complementary and alternative medicine by people with MS.

J Altern Complement Med. 2018 Mar 2. doi: 10.1089/acm.2017.0268. [Epub ahead of print]

Complementary and Alternative Medicine Usage by Multiple Sclerosis Patients: Results from a Prospective Clinical Study.

Kim S, Chang L, Weinstock-Guttman B, Gandhi S, Jakimovski D, Carl E, Zivadinov R, Ramanathan M.



To investigate the factors associated with complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) usage by multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Design, Setting/Location: Single-center, prospective clinical study at an academic MS center in the northeastern United States.


This study included CAM data from 524 MS patients and 304 healthy controls (HC) enrolled in a prospective study of clinical, neuroimaging, and environmental risk factors in MS at an academic MS Center. Clinical, neuroimaging, and disease-modifying treatment data were obtained. In addition, data on usage of CAM modalities, including acupuncture, aromatherapy, Ayurveda, Chinese herbal medicine, chiropractor, electromagnetic therapy, homeopathy, hypnosis, massage, naturopathy, Qi gong, Reiki, therapeutic touch, and bee stings were collected in an in-person interview.


The percentages of HC reporting usage of any CAM (32%) was similar to that in MS patients after diagnosis (30.5%). The usage of any CAM was higher in MS patients after MS diagnosis compared to before MS diagnosis (p < 0.001). The three most frequently used CAM for MS patients after MS diagnosis and HC were chiropractor, massage, and acupuncture. The most frequent reasons for CAM use were MS symptom relief, back problems, and pain. In multivariate analysis, female gender, higher education level, MS disease course, and not currently on disease-modifying therapies (DMT) treatment status were associated with CAM usage.


Gender, education level, DMT treatment status, and MS disease course are associated with CAM usage in MS patients. Ever-CAM usage patterns in MS patients are similar to those in HC.

I'll start by saying that this post is not a jab at complementary or alternative medicines. Although my interest is in empirical evidence, I am not against creationism or as it applies to medicine, the whole of it ("holistic medicine"). Many of my patients use or have used alternative approaches to cope with MS symptoms - particularly acupuncture for neuropathic pain; which, I believe has a role to play in MS. But, I wonder how many doctors still practice under the misconception that since patients seek conventional medical care that they are not also utilizing nontraditional therapies?

Kim et al. state: "Not all patients respond well to their prescribed DMT, which have limited efficacy and side effects that may require additional management". They state that PwMS look to complementary and alternative medicines in hopes of improving their quality of life. And wanted to understand their usage patterns in PwMS to better inform healthcare providers.

They looked at 524 PwMS (~66% RRMS) and 304 controls. The most commonly utilized services were chiropacter, massage and acupuncture, and whilst there were no significant differences between PwMS and controls, PwMS did seek out more complementary or alternative therapies after MS diagnosis. Frequently indicated reasons were symptom relief, back problems and pain. Interestingly, 5.6% of the group with a postgraduate degree were more likely to utilize alternative therapies (~55%) compared to those with other educational levels, in particular massages. And not surprisingly, usage of alternative medicine was more frequent in those not on conventional disease modifying therapies (~42%). The frequency was higher in the PPMS group where there is only now an approved therapy.

In this study, they did not look at the utilization of herbal and dietary supplements, but have in a prior publication reported that ~27% PwMS used herbal treatments for at least a month. The most commonly used herbal treatment was evening primrose oil (~40%). Keep in mind that this later study was completed in 2012 before marijuana legalization in New York (2014) and greater use of cannabis by PwMS. The authors do question whether greater utilization of complementary and alternative medicines will affect a person's perception and compliance with conventional therapies, especially as the wider community become more accepting or tolerant of their use?


  1. A better question would be why are so many MS patients looking to alternate answers. It is because they are worsening and current conventional therapies have failed them terribly.

    It is because there is absolutely nothing out there for treatment of progression of MS. At best, there "may" be an underwhelming selection bias 23% reduction in progression with the "best" medication currently available.

    There are no treatments for neuroprotection, remyelination or neurorestoration anywhere on neurology/pharma grid in the near future.

    MS patients are mainly relying on anecdotal studies, testimonials or phase 1 & 2 data for guidance. Neurology is of little to no help in progressive patients. Pharma will not bring any alternative drug to trial or to the market as they are not going to be lucrative enough for them.

    Sitting on our hands and waiting for neurology/pharma is not the answer for many progressive MS patients in this devastating disease where the clock is ticking. This is what leads to alternative treatments, even if not proven.

    1. Wow - good luck with responding with Nissan's comment!

    2. Eschewing platitudes, it's almost impossible and I share NG's frustration.

    3. The fact that you are frustrated and bring that sense of urgency to your work is what gives me most hope. x

    4. Biotin is currently under clinical trial but I don’t see how an otc vit is going to generate profit. MS is only one neurological disease of the many without treatment for neuroprotection/restoration. Although if inflammation is halted there is evidence for neuroprotection to an extent.

    5. And we will keep on going until the situation changes. If you keep banging your head against a brick wall, eventually you knock a brick out.


  3. There are a lot of potential neuroprotective agents out there. This blog hasn't yet talked about GLP-1 agonists; why?

    Add: BPC-157, HGH, various powerful antioxidants, RAD140, etc. Maybe even things like Semax which increases BDNF, or small molecule BDNF and NGF receptor agonists of which you can find good recent examples in the literature.

    IMO: HSCT to deal with the inflammation. Then permanent combination therapy with neuroprotectives like those listed above. Most of what I listed above are also potent remyelinators. Could also look into intrathecal injection of neural stem cells which you can go overseas to do just like with HSCT.

    1. Until treat is in late stage development there is no point. Most will never go any where near ms and there is supposition


Please note that all comments are moderated and any personal or marketing-related submissions will not be shown.