Are You Honest and Happy?
Survey says
Eijkholt M, Sparling A. Health, honesty and happiness: Authenticity and anonymity in social media participation of individuals with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Sep 19;27:121-126
Survey says
Eijkholt M, Sparling A. Health, honesty and happiness: Authenticity and anonymity in social media participation of individuals with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Sep 19;27:121-126
BACKGROUND:Multiple Sclerosis (MS) can impair social participation and lead to isolation. Online platforms could help to increase this participation for individuals with MS, circumventing potential physical, emotional and cognitive barriers. Yet, minimal research has examined the differential impact of online versus face-to face interaction on happiness.
OBJECTIVE: In our study we analyzed the relationship between honesty, anonymity, and happiness in individuals diagnosed with MS, who reported using online social networks.
METHODS: We merged answers of 440 individuals from the Davidson Social Participation Survey with the NARCOMS Enrollment and Update Surveys.
RESULTS: Individuals reported they could be more honest in face-to face interactions than with online contacts, regardless of whether they were anonymous or identifiable. Happiness was associated with honesty or authenticity in in-person interactions. We found a negative association between happiness and honesty for anonymous participants online, and no association between happiness and honesty when using real names. Consistent results emerged for individuals using patient-specific and generic platforms.
CONCLUSION: Our study implies that anonymity may not improve happiness of individuals with MS. We need to address structural barriers to enable their in-person interactions.
OBJECTIVE: In our study we analyzed the relationship between honesty, anonymity, and happiness in individuals diagnosed with MS, who reported using online social networks.
METHODS: We merged answers of 440 individuals from the Davidson Social Participation Survey with the NARCOMS Enrollment and Update Surveys.
RESULTS: Individuals reported they could be more honest in face-to face interactions than with online contacts, regardless of whether they were anonymous or identifiable. Happiness was associated with honesty or authenticity in in-person interactions. We found a negative association between happiness and honesty for anonymous participants online, and no association between happiness and honesty when using real names. Consistent results emerged for individuals using patient-specific and generic platforms.
CONCLUSION: Our study implies that anonymity may not improve happiness of individuals with MS. We need to address structural barriers to enable their in-person interactions.
So remember when you do a comment slagging us off under anonymous, we now know that you are not happy:-)
No wonder you get survey fatigue.